• Blog
  • Wastewater Testing
  • Bioaugmentation Applications
  • Useful Information
  • About Us
BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT EXPERT
Contact Us

Odor Control Using Oxidant Chemistry in Collection Systems

2/21/2023

 
I have seen recent social media posts showing people pouring concentrated hydrogen peroxide into manholes, lift-stations, biological treatment plants, and even lakes. The claim is that hydrogen peroxide is not harmful to anything and solves all problems from FOG to hazardous algae blooms. In the videos, people are pouring 5 gallon pails of peroxide into all of the above. I know people want to sell their products and talk about the benefits of their technology. However, every product has strengths and weaknesses and may or may not fit the application. 

When it comes to oxidant chemistry in collection systems, you have many choices. You need to find the one that best matches site specific challenges and keeps costs under control. This often means that a multiple lift station collection system benefits from using multiple technologies. To choose among technologies it helps to:
  • Know the strengths and weaknesses of each approach
  • You need to know the system - map out ORP, discover anoxic/anaerobic zones, find out where FOG is accumulating and why - there is a lot to mapping out the problems, but it is a vital step in optimizing treatment.
  • Implement solutions and monitor/adjust programs.

Now for most used oxidant technology options.
Picture

Using and interpreting OUR results

2/1/2023

 
Picture
Oxygen Uptake Rates (OUR) - also called Dissolved Oxygen Uptake Rates (DOUR) are one of the common wastewater tests that give valuable information on microbial activity levels. A fast and simple test, OUR measures oxygen consumption by biomass over time. Results are expressed as mg O2/L/hr. It is similar to more complex respirometery testing; it is just faster and requires no special equipment.

Theoretical Background
  • Aerobic Bacteria (microbes) use oxygen when growing
  • More "food" = faster growth and higher OUR 
  • Mature or older biomass = slower growth and lower OUR 
  • More biological solids mean more endogenous respiration, so we introduce SOUR to account for different MLSS or MLVSS concentrations
Standardized Oxygen Uptake Rates (SOUR) - account for changes in biological solids
Important for activated sludge – divide OUR by MLVSS in g – to adjust for background respiration by solids. Note if you use MLSS instead of MLVSS as solids. MLSS > MLVSS. Whatever you use just be consistent!

Normal OUR
While there are "rules of thumb" for OUR, that does not replace routine testing of your specific system. Operations and sample points will make a difference in OUR. The test takes less than 10 minutes so take a few minutes and run the test as frequently as feasible.

Interpretation of Results
Remember we are using respiration rates to estimate where we are on the growth curve – works with microscopic exam, SV30/SVI, and other tests

Low OUR (< baseline average)
  • Lower F/M (less BOD) or “older” biomass
  • For industrial – can also indicate toxic shock where you actually killed viable microbes and have yet to enter log growth.
  • Low OUR can indicate moving into endogenous phase of the growth curve
High OUR (> baseline averages)
  • Increased soluble BOD5 - microbes are growing faster which is also higher F/M and "young" biomass
  • Very high OUR can indicate log phase of the growth curve

Micronutrients - What are they and can they benefit your system

1/19/2023

 
Picture
Electron microscope view of bacterial floc.
Bacteria require nutrients for building new cellular material and act as co-factors for various enzymes. The macronutrients are needed by most cells and at higher concentrations than micronutrients.

First the Macronutrients
  • Carbon, Hydrogen, & Oxygen - the backbone of organic chemistry
  • Nitrogen - used for proteins, enzymes, and nucleic acids
  • Phosphorus - used in nucleic acids, phospholipids, and ATP
  • Sulfur - for several amino acids and vitamins
  • Potassium - in multiple enzymes
  • Magnesium - cell stabilization of ribosomes and membranes
  • Iron (Fe) 
  • Calcium 
Micronutrients
Function as enzyme cofactors and are not required by all bacteria - concentrations required are in the ppb - or nanograms per Liter.  Micronutrients required by anaerobic methanogen archaea are noted.
  • Manganese
  • Copper
  • Zinc
  • Nickel - vital for methanogens
  • Cobalt - vital for methanogens
  • Selenium
  • Molybdenum - vital for methanogens

Does adding micronutrients make a difference in microbial activity?
The short answer is "it depends" - in the case of domestic wastewater, you have an abundance of all nutrients. And, in industrial wastewater, you usually lack mostly nitrogen or phosphorus. All can be checked with laboratory analysis of the influent and if you are deficient in specific micronutrients, then can be added at low cost.

The "it depends" part comes from some pretreatment steps and other chemical additives having an ability to bind to trace metals making them not available to support bacterial metabolism. I have seen this with AOB/NOB cultures and in anaerobic digesters. 

One interesting paper found anaerobic digesters receiving alum or ferric pretreated domestic primary sludge benefitted from added Bacillus bioaugmentation and micronutrients. Here is the abstract:

Water Sci Technology 2005;52(1-2):275-81.
Effect of biological additives and micronutrients on the anaerobic digestion of physicochemical sludge
A Noyola 1, A Tinajero
Affiliations expand
PMID: 16180439
 
Abstract
Two additives (lyophilized bacilli and enzymes) and a solution of micronutrients (Fe, Co, Ni and Mo) were tried separately and in combination, in order to assess their effect on the anaerobic digestion of waste sludge from an enhanced primary treatment (EPT) of municipal wastewater. Three batch tests were carried out in serological bottles. In the first test, addition of bacilli increased production of methane from day 11 and at day 17 the production was 95% greater than the control. In that experiment, the concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) was 1,391 mg/L, 40% lower than the control. In the second test, the combination of micronutrients with bacilli, reached from the first days a better methane production than the control, 167% higher in day 17. At the end of the experiment, this combination achieved a lower concentration of VFAs and a greater percentage of volatile solid removal than the rest of the treatments. The third test was based on an experimental design in order to statistically determine the best doses of bacilli additive and micronutrients. The anaerobic thermophilic digestion of sludge from aluminum sulfate EPT will be improved with the addition of Fe: 4.5 mg/g VS, Ni: 0.75 mg/g VS, Co: 0.45 mg/g VS, Mo: 0.09 mg/g VS and bacilli additive: 12 mg/g VS.

Handling low temperature wastewater challenges

1/12/2023

 
Picture
Janthinobacter sp. - a low temperature wastewater isolate. The purple color is from the production of pigments by the organism.
We have all read that for every 10 Deg C drop in water temperature, microbial activity drops by 50%. This is true in the mesophilic temperature range but there are some “hard” inflection points where microbial activity exhibits significant changes. With low wastewater temperatures, we often have trouble maintaining Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria (AOB) and Nitrite Oxidizing Bacteria (NOB) populations. The normal slow growth rate of AOB & NOB is compounded by reduced activity brought on by low temperatures.
 
Before water temperatures drop, you should increase MLSS concentrations. More biomass means lower F/M for when organism metabolism slows. This is also the same as increasing MCRT.
 
Other engineering solutions in areas with prolonged low temperatures is to use deeper basins with less surface area. Aeration via diffusers (no surface aerators). Using attached growth (MBBR or RBC) and MBR systems also allow for higher biological solids concentrations and can be used to retrofit existing systems.
 
For occasions where biomass has not had time to increase/adapt and low temperatures slow growth, you can use bioaugmentation. This works by increasing the number of active microorganisms, especially those organisms that function well below 15 Deg C. Over the years, we have found wastewater heterotrophic organisms with growth down to 3 – 5 Deg C. 

Effluent ammonia increasing – trouble shooting and finding the correct response

1/4/2023

 
Picture
qPCR curves used to calculate % AOB and % NOB
What can cause sudden increase in effluent ammonia
  • Rapid increase in loading – Ammonia & TKN
    • Look at influent loadings – total nitrogen loading is needed
    • As both AOB/NOB are slow growing it can take time to catch up to influent increase
  • Inhibition – slowing of AOB & NOB metabolism
    • D.O. being < 2 mg/L
    • COD/BOD inhibition – Rule of Thumb – 80% COD needs to be removed before AOB/NOB tend to fully function in WW
    • pH < 7.0 or >8.5
    • Alkalinity
    • Temperature <12 or >38 Deg C
    • Enzyme cofactors – trace metals lacking or being bound
    • UV radiation (sunlight)
  • Washout
    • Slow growth and short MCRT – can lead to AOB/NOB washout (population drop as reproduction is not fast enough)
    • This often goes along with inhibitory factors slowing growth rates
  • Acute toxicity – kill of AOB/NOB
    • Some compounds have acute toxicity – thiourea, carbon disulfide, sulfide, cyanide, phenol
    • Total loss of aeration for extended periods with septicity 
    • Not that common in most WWTP 

Tools to directly monitor AOB/NOB populations
  • Aster Bio uses molecular tools to track for potential inhibition & washout
  • qPCR for wastewater organisms – use primers based on actual WWTP data can directly enumerate populations
  • MCA – total microbial census gives data on both AOB & NOB as % of total reads
  • Answers questions – total toxicity, inhibition, or insufficient populations for current loadings
 
What to do if you suddenly see an increase in effluent ammonia
  • Run qPCR to identify the root of the problem
  • If influent ammonia/TKN increase is the issue
    • Slow influent flow if possible, this will give time for AOB/NOB growth
    • Adjust environmental conditions in the biological unit to maximize AOB/NOB growth
    • Add nitrifiers – decrease time required to adjust to full AOB/NOB population
  • Toxicity – loss of all AOB/NOB populations
    • Find out what happened!
    • Remove problems from influent & increase wasting if it builds up in the MLSS
    • Adding nitrifiers or outside MLSS can help but only if inhibitors/toxic agents are removed
  • Washout
    • Usually not a sudden increase – this is a gradual process, and you have warning
    • Reduce wasting rates
    • Enhance environmental conditions for AOB/NOB
 Key points
Check as to why you are seeing increased effluent ammonia
  • Something had to change!
  • Was it gradual or sudden
  • Influent TKN is important - as much as influent ammonia
  • If toxicity or inhibition is found, you must eliminate it as much as possible! Added nitrifiers from commercial blends are just as susceptible to inhibition as indigenous.
  • qPCR is best tool to find out direct information on the AOB & NOB populations
  • If adding nitrifiers, the dose depends upon growth rates and how much ammonia needs to be oxidized. We want to give the best growth environment possible.
 

Differences between young sludge and old sludge in wastewater treatment

12/15/2022

 
Picture
From Wastewaterblog by Rick Fuller.
We often use the terms “young sludge” and “old sludge” to describe problem biomass. What do these terms mean when it comes to the actual bacteria and biomass? 
​
Components of floc
  • Living bacteria – in Activated Sludge this is often only 5 – 15% of the solids.
  • Dead bacteria
  • Insoluble organics & inoraganics
  • Extracellular Polymers (EPS) – made by bacteria to store organics, protect cells, and for extracellular enzyme control
 
The ideal floc contains a mix of the above at ratios where the solids are bound in a dense mass that settles well in clarification. In MBR systems, floc should readily separate from effluent and not blind pores in the membrane.
 
Young Sludge
Bacteria are rapidly dividing giving a high respiration rate (OUR) and free bacteria cells in solution. Rapidly dividing cells have yet to form sufficient dense EPS for target floc density. Color is often light. With respect to the growth curve, young sludge is seen where you have higher than design F/M (excess food).
 
Old Sludge
This is a system with low rates of bacterial division, and you get higher % dead bacterial cells and inorganics in the floc. With low division rates and fewer living bacteria, you also see lower respiration rates. The EPS that holds the floc becomes a source of “food” along with slower to degrade particulates. As the EPS is consumed, you end up with smaller pin floc and “fines” increasing turbidity in the supernatant. With the growth curve chart, you are in the decline/death phase.
 
Activated Sludge systems were designed to operate in the stationery to early decline phase of growth. This is where you maintain good levels of EPS with removal of soluble BOD (organics).

<<Previous

    Author

    Erik Rumbaugh has been involved in biological waste treatment for over 20 years. He has worked with industrial and municipal wastewater  facilities to ensure optimal performance of their treatment systems. He is a founder of Aster Bio (www.asterbio.com) specializing in biological waste treatment.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

    Click to set custom HTML

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos used under Creative Commons from Picturepest, marcoverch, perzonseowebbyra, Picturepest, Picturepest, dsearls, dungodung, Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism, aqua.mech, vastateparksstaff, hile, Aaron Volkening, amishsteve, Neil DeMaster, mklwong88, KOMUnews, Picturepest, kaibara87