Why you should monitor M. parvicella populations
- Sludge Bulking: It leads to poor settling characteristics, resulting in high sludge volume index (SVI) values.
- Foaming: Creates stable foams that can overflow tanks, causing operational difficulties.
- Process Disruption: Affects the overall performance of the activated sludge process, leading to compliance issues.
Current control strategies
- FOG Control: Keeping FOG down disfavors the foam producing filaments, especially important in winter.
- Adjust MCRT: Shorter MCRT results keeps slower growing filaments from over taking desirable floc forming organisms.
- Disinfection: Use of hypochlorite or other oxidant chemistry can be used to damage filaments. Not an easy fix but can be used in times of critical performance issues.
- Bioaugmentation: Adding low temperature organisms with the ability to degrade FOG under winter conditions can help in systems with elevated influent FOG or extensive histories with cold weather foaming.
Embracing a more holistic approach for winter operations
Maintaining nitrifier populations while keeping winter's problematic filaments under control requires maintaining a delicate ecological balance. There is no single fix or program that replaces understanding and monitoring the complex ecosystem inside the MLSS. Using molecular tools gives vital details on even slight changes in populations and guides operators in adjusting wasting rates and other control options. It is best to monitor and catch problems before they result in increased chemical use or compromise treatment efficiency.
If you have any questions about molecular testing or foaming control options, you can contact us at [email protected] or visit our website at www.asterbio.com.