• Blog
  • Lab Testing
  • Bioaugmentation Applications
  • Useful Information
  • About Us
BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT EXPERT
Contact Us

Low-Cost Wastewater Treatment using Lagoon Systems

6/26/2014

 
Picture
Lagoons are one of the oldest and most cost-effective ways to treat municipal wastewater. Lagoon treatment systems are often found in rural and small municipalities where enough land is readily available. Even with the latest generation of wastewater permits with BOD/COD, TSS, ammonia and phosphate removal required for needed effluent treatment; a lagoon system offers the easiest to operate at the lowest cost for many facilities and towns.

There are four types of lagoons seen in field practice: 

  1. Anaerobic Lagoons - are deep impoundments suited for treating higher strength wastewater including meat processing, dairy, and feed lot wastes. With a depth of 8 - 15 feet, the wastewater separates into layers with a cap of grease and solids forming a barrier to oxygen which allows for true anaerobic microbes to thrive in the deeper regions of the lagoon. Facultative and fermentative anaerobes degrade organics into short chain fatty acids utilized by the methanogenic organaisms. With a sufficient retention time and absence of oxygen, the anaerobic lagoon produces methane and carbon dioxide while removing substantial quantities of BOD/COD.

  2. Facultative Lagoons - are used to treat moderate strength wastewater such as that found in domestic waste. Oxygen for aerobic microbes is provided by wave action and algae growth. Further down in the lagoon, activity transitions to microaerophilic (D.O. <0.25 mg/L), and finally to the true anaerobic zone on the bottom. Designed based on organic (BOD) loading, lagoons should receive between 13 - 70 lbs/acre/day with a residence time of 20 - 180 days based on location and average temperatures.

  3. Aerated Lagoons - a common modification of facultative lagoons includes the addition of mechanical aeration. In this system there is less seasonal variation in treatment efficiency, and the BOD loadings can be increased over facultative lagoons. Treatment time (given by hydraulic detention time) is also reduced. Aerated lagoons are commonly used to treat pulp & paper and municipal wastewater where a facultative system is either too large or cannot adequately meet treatment needs. BOD removal in lagoon systems can be upwards of 95%.

  4. Polishing Ponds - are a low loading lagoon found at the end of more aggressive biological treatment. Designed to remove solids by gravity separation, a polishing pond can also remove some of the remaining BOD while also allowing for ammonia removal (nitrification). Polishing ponds are often designed for a BOD loading of 15 - 25 lbs/acre/day with a retention time of 10 - 20 days. UV light from the sun also works to lower fecal counts in wastewater.

pH & Wastewater Microbes

6/24/2014

 
Picture
pH has a significant impact on the microbial makeup of a wastewater system. Most biological wastewater treatment is accomplished at pH range of 6.5 - 8.5, which is where a majority of our common environmental microbes thrive. Today, I want to detail how (1) long run high or low pH can impact microbial populations and (2) what rapid shifts in pH can do to biomass performance.

Many systems such as pulp mills operate at an inlet pH > 9.5 which is not often mentioned in literature. This constant loading creates an environment where alkaliphile, organisms that thrive at pH from 8.7 - 11.0. Alkaliphiles function like "normal" wastewater organisms except their enzyme systems are optimized for high pH environments. As with temperature, many organisms can be facultative alkaliphiles which thrive from pH 6.5 - 10.5 (common in Bacillus sp).

Systems that operate in lower pH are also seen in in systems with influent from metal finishing, fruit processing, and some chemical operations. If a system is operated below pH of 5.5, we start to see increasing number of fungal cultures. Other organisms that thrive in acid pH with high levels of sulfides include Thiobacillus sp. which create their own acid environment by converting H2S into H2SO4 when oxygen levels are sufficient. All of the acidophile organisms have enzymes and cellular operations that thrive with the low pH.

What we do not see in either low pH or high pH wastewater systems is the growth of autotrophic nitriiers which thrive at pH from 7.2 - 8.0 when you go below 6.5 or above 8.5 the autotrophic nitifiers (Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter) will "washout" or "die" and ammonia oxidation will become compromised.


The biggest challenges for operators occur when a system undergoes a rapid pH shift. While a biological system can often adapt to long run high or low pH operation, a rapid shift in pH from of  can have immediate impact on the biomass. Often the first observed change following a pH shock is increased TSS & turbidity at the effluent. The bacteria in response to unfavorable conditions begin to lose beneficial biopolymer bonds that form floc and biofilms. If rapidly corrected to normal pH levels, the biomass should rapidly come back to proper floc/biofilm formation. In cases where the pH swing also causes cell death and more complete biopolymer failure, operators often find a benefit to adding adapted cultures to avoid the time lag seen to bring the system back into proper biomass conditions (also known as decline phase) where microbes are at maximum density and proper biofilm conditions.

Temperature Impact on Biological Unit Microbes

6/18/2014

 
Picture
Commonly encountered microbes are roughly classified into the three temperature groups (1) Psychrotroph (low temperatures), (2) Mesophile (medium temperatures usually 15 - 40 deg C), and (3) Thermophile (Temperatures from 45 - 80 deg C). Most of our wastewater treatment plants operate in the mesophile temperature range for much of the year.

The image above gives the general ranges of the organisms where you should also note the overlap in each group. I have come to see the transition zone from one group to the other as a "Problem Zone" where none of the individual groups is completely in its optimum growth range. Frequently we see this problem as increase in effluent suspended solids (TSS) for both the low and high temperatures. Also with low temperatures slowing metabolic activity in general, the low temperature problem zone also can cause problem with BOD/COD removal.

In my field of bioaugmentation or adding in select cultures to wastewater systems to enhance treatment, we add organisms that are very successful in the problem zone ranges to quickly establish the new microbial population that nature is taking its time to develop. By adding cultures, the system can be rapidly brought back under control for the entire period of high or  low temperatures.

Types of Microbes in Wastewater Treatment Plants

6/12/2014

 
PictureBacillus seen using electron microscopy
The microbes in the wastewater treatment plant include:

Bacteria:
As small prokaryotic (no cell nucleus or organelles), bacteria form the "backbone" of the wastewater treatment plant in that they are the most common organisms and they do most of the work in converting pollutants into non-hazardous forms. The species vary according to system temperature, pH, inlet chemical makeup, dissolved oxygen, and other environmental factors. Usually we classify wastewater bacteria based on their ability to grow under various temperatures (psychrophiles, mesophiles, thermophiles) and the ability to utilize oxygen or other electron acceptor for cellular respiration (aerobic, facultative anaerobic, obligate anaerobe).

Fungi:
A more complex organism than bacteria, Fungi can be unicellular (yeasts) or multicellular with hyphae. In waste treatment we usually have higher concentrations of fungi under low pH conditions (pH <5.0). Other factors that can favor fungi include complex organics (lignin and other complex biopolymers) and low concentration of macronutrients (nitrogen & phosphorus). Usually fungi are found in much lower concentrations than bacteria in wastewater.

Archaea:
Once classified as an unusual bacteria group, over the past 20 years scientists have moved archaea into a separate kingdom. Possessing unique cell membranes and chemistry, archaea microbes are found in such environments as ocean thermal vents, hot springs, anaerobic digesters, ruminant digestive systems, and other diverse environments. In waste treatment we most often see archaea in methane producing microbes in anaerobic digesters. These methanogens, produce methane from short-chain organic acids and H2 which are produced by facultative and obligate anaerobic bacteria. The activity of the methanogens is vital for COD/BOD reduction in anaerobic digesters and for production of methane gas. Most other archaea are found in low concentrations in wastewater treatment plants and are secondary to bacteria in importance.

How bioaugmentation can speed up bioremediation projects

6/8/2014

 
PictureHydrocarbon Contaminated Sludge Pond
Almost all organic compounds can be transformed by microbes into carbon dioxide, water, and new cellular material. Problems arise when the degradation rate occurs only under specific conditions not present at the site or the decay rate is so slow that changes are required for bioremediation to be a viable cleanup option.

A site's bioremediation potential is first evaluated by determining the types and extent of pollutants present. Following site characterization, a remediation plan is developed based on the pollutants present, site characteristics, environmental variables, and cleanup time frame.

The compounds present may include some organics that are slow to degrade or have a degree of toxicity/quasi-toxicity to many microbes. In these cases, the time for cleanup can be reduced by first adding the mixing/aeration and fertilizers as used in biostimulation; then on-site time can be further reduced by avoiding the adaptation and lag phase growth of indigenous microbes via the use of bioaugmentation.

Using data from the site characterization, microbiologists can develop a microbial blend containing organisms having specific metabolic pathways for degrading target organics. Another consideration is the ability of organisms to produce biosurfactants, that improve activity by enhancing hydrophobic compound solubility. The extent of the benefit depends upon the "fit" of the microbial inoculum used and the general state  of indigenous microbes already at the site. Overall, usually the decrease in on-site remediation activities including labor, lab testing, and risks associated with an active remediation project can pay for the use bioaugmentation.

Indicator Protozoa - Stalk Ciliate

6/6/2014

 
PictureStalk Ciliate (200x)
Recently, I was doing a microscopic examination of an industrial activated sludge plant's mixed liquor. Microscopic exams are a very good way to monitor a biological system's overall health. With a simple microscope having 10x and 40x objectives, an operator within 5 minutes can obtain very important information that can reveal: (1) warnings of potential toxic upset, (2) estimate changes in soluble BOD & COD, (3) predict issues with effluent suspended solids (TSS) and turbidity, and (4) determine impact of new influent streams on biomass. Knowledge of any one of these variables is important, but the ability to cover all variables with an easy 5 minute test with no extensive equipment or reagents makes it a double benefit to doing frequent microscopic exams.

When doing a microscopic exam at 100x or 400x magnification, the bacteria do not appear particularly distinctive. In fact, free bacteria are the small round, oval, or rods that appear to be bouncing around in the water. Bacteria in biofilm or floc appear as larger aggregates that should be evaluated for size and density. However, what we usually note in microscopic exams are the protozoa that are associated with the bacteria. The observed protozoa are highly dependent upon water quality
which is why frequent use of microscopic exam can establish a baseline and any changes is readily apparent.

The organisms pictured above is a stalk ciliate. This protozoa is found in systems with low soluble BOD, good floc formation that allows for stalk attachment, and sufficient dissolved oxygen. Any toxic shocks will cause stalk ciliates to detach from the floc or disappear completely.



    Author

    Erik Rumbaugh has been involved in biological waste treatment for over 20 years. He has worked with industrial and municipal wastewater  facilities to ensure optimal performance of their treatment systems. He is a founder of Aster Bio (www.asterbio.com) specializing in biological waste treatment.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

    Click to set custom HTML

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos from Picturepest, marcoverch, perzonseowebbyra, Picturepest, Picturepest, dsearls, dungodung, Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism, aqua.mech, vastateparksstaff, hile, Aaron Volkening, amishsteve, Neil DeMaster, mklwong88, KOMUnews, Picturepest, kaibara87, Bernd Thaller