• Blog
  • Wastewater Testing
  • Bioaugmentation Applications
  • Useful Information
  • About Us
BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT EXPERT
Contact Us

How obligate anaerobes can grow in my aerobic wastewater system - the concept of ecological micro-niches

7/31/2017

 
Picture
Most wastewater treatment theory sees each section or segment as having homogenous ecological environments. Instead, you find that environmental variables change with physical distance from the floc surface or depth in the biofilm. For microbes in activated sludge floc, distance from the floc surface also changes D.O., pH, nutrients, exposure to both organics and potentially toxic organics. Organisms deeper in the floc have a more uniform environment, but have less D.O. and access to soluble organics than floc surface organisms.

In addition to physical location in the biofilm/floc, you also need to consider how biological unit conditions can impact floc composition. Higher stress levels (pH, temperatures, toxic compounds, etc) encourage the production of protective extracellular polymer substances (EPS). The EPS acts as a permeable barrier between the microbial cell walls and the external environment. While necessary for building the floc aggregates, EPS can also cause non-filamentous bulking, problems with dewatering, or weak floc structure. Therefore, changes in EPS composition or quantity also changes the ecological conditions for organisms inside the floc.
​
While a system may be aerobic with D.O. levels measured at above 3.0 mg/L throughout a basin, the underlying biomass can have organisms experiencing aerobic, anoxic, and anaerobic environments. This variation in environmental conditions within biofilms requires us to think about environmental micro-niches. This explains why 16sRNA genomic testing often finds obligate anaerobic cultures in “aerobic systems”. Or how long sludge ages in industrial wastewater treatment can have anammox cultures. If you observe unusual behavior in biological waste treatment systems, you may want to look at potential micro-niches for the explanation.

Aster Bio's Environmental Genomics™ - DNA based monitoring for environmental samples has officially  launched

7/27/2017

 
Picture
  Over the past several years, Aster Bio has used advanced DNA testing including metagenomics, 16s rRNA and qPCR. We have found the technologies have given better information than traditional microbiological testing (plate counts, stains, etc) for many of our daily activities. That left us wondering, could Aster Bio reduce both the time and cost of running molecular (DNA) tests. Through over three years of work, we have reached a point where molecular testing is now a practical monitoring and troubleshooting tool for wastewater operators. Here is how we have used Environmental Genomics™ testing results:
  • Identify changes in the MLSS microbial mix following any change in a system
  • Find key organisms associated with "good" operational efficiency
  • Evaluate what is actually going on in the biomass - for example, how low DO and anaerobic organisms were found and growing in an "aerobic" basin
  • Discover microbial candidates for addition following shock loadings or washout (custom bioaugmentation products)
  • In biological nutrient removal (Phosphorus, Ammonia, Nitrite/Nitrate, and Anammox processes) - we can look into the microbial mix to ensure the correct cultures are thriving.
For more information on Environmental Genomics testing 
http://www.asterbio.com/environmentalgenomics/
or email us at
info@asterbio.com

Relationship among MLSS, MLVSS & actual living microbes in wastewater

7/24/2017

 
We do F/M calculations with either MLSS or MLVSS standing in as "microbes". However, both MLSS & MLVSS contain more "other" than actual living microbes. Depending upon the system, the living microbe portion of MLVSS can have a range from <10 to over 20% with younger sludge ages having a greater percentage as living, active microbes.
Picture

Organisms & ecological niches of organisms responsible for ammonia oxidation & nitrogen removal

7/21/2017

 
Picture
As ammonia has a high oxygen demand and potential toxicity to animals in receiving streams, ammonia has long been permitted in wastewater treatment plants Additional concerns about nitrite and nitrate creating algae blooms has created a need for completing the nitrogen cycle by reducing nitrate/nitrite concentrations via denitrification (producing nitrogen gas. Research over the past few decades has increased our understanding of the various bacteria and archaea associated with the nitrogen cycle. For reference, I will break out the organisms into their kingdom and ecological niche:
  • Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria (AOB) convert Ammonia --> Nitrite
  • Ammonia Oxidizing Archaea (AOA) convert Ammonia --> Nitrite
  • Nitrite Oxidizing Bacteria (NOB) convert Nitrite --> Nitrate
  • Anammox - Nitrite + Ammonia --> Nitrogen Gas
  • Heterotrophic (Denitrification & Nitrification) 
    BOD5 + Nitrate/Nitrite --> Nitrogen gas (oxidized nitrogen as alternative electron acceptor)
    Ammonia/Nitrite --> Proteins, oxidized nitrogen (not primary energy source for microbes)

Simultaneous nitrification/denitrification & phosphorous removal in Aerobic Granular Sludge (AGS) wastewater treatment systems

7/17/2017

 
Picture
Aerobic Sludge Granule has aerobic, anoxic, & anaerobic zones that interact as a complete ecosystem.
Wastewater treatment plants face increasingly stringent permits requiring removal of nitrate, nitrite, and soluble phosphate from effluent flows. Often biological nutrient removal systems are extensions on the conventional activated sludge system. Nitrate/nitrite removal is accomplished by adding an anoxic zone following the aerobic treatment section. For proper nitrate/nitrite removal, the anoxic basin much have sufficiently low redox potentials and soluble BOD5 (for the microbes to consume while using nitrate/nitrite as an electron acceptor). If biological phosphate removal is required, the system must have an anaerobic influent section with sufficient organic acids to encourage PAO growth. The anaerobic section must have sufficient organic acids and no nitrate which can favor non-PAO organisms. Besides the need for soluble organics in the anaerobic and anoxic sections, operators must balance flows to maintain residence times and monitor for the growth of problematic microbes.

Given the complexities of operating a biological nutrient removal system, research on creating alternative treatment technologies has been a priority. One of the promising technologies is aerobic granular sludge(AGS). While granular anaerobic systems have existed for years, aerobic granules are new to wastewater treatment. In nature, microbes form diverse communities in the form of biofilms (or floc in activated sludge). As the microbial community matures, distinct ecological zones form inside the film. The film surface has free oxygen present, favoring aerobic organisms. In the aerobic zone you have a highly diverse collection of microbes including ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB). Moving deeper into the biofilm, an anoxic zone exists. In the anoxic zone, free oxygen is not present and bacteria work by using alternative electron acceptors such as nitrate/nitrite. Given ammonia oxidation in the aerobic surface layer, the anoxic zone bacteria make use of nitrate/nitrite produced in the aerobic layer. In mature granules, we also see the presence of anammox bacteria that utilize ammonium (NH4+) and nitrite (NO2) to make dinitrogen gas (N2). Anammox microbes are interesting in that they reduce oxygen requirements for ammonia removal while also avoiding the need to remove nitrate/nitrite in a separate step. At the core of the granule, or deepest section of a biofilm, exists a true anaerobic zone. This section utilizes soluble organics and contains both PAO that instead of using aerobic conditions to uptake phosphorus utilize nitrate/nitrite present in low concentrations at the deepest part of the granule/biofilm.

The key part of aerobic granule systems is the ability to build a fast settling granular biomass. This has been accomplished in SBR (batch reactors) where operators can control operational parameters including mixing, aeration, and residence time with maximum flexibility. In practice, granular systems have performed will for treatment, but may require a tertiary clarifier to remove residual solids that come from sloughing biomass.

How Aster Bio's new Environmental Genomics™ (molecular testing of environmental samples) compares with existing monitoring tools

7/13/2017

 
Picture
.Environmental Genomics™ technology combines molecular testing using advanced metagenomics technologies including 16s rDNA, qPCR, and full metagenomic sequencing. This technology looks directly into the genetic makeup of the biomass and gives direct insight into what is happening at a genetic level. Recent improvements in sequencing technologies allow for cost-effective and timely analysis that proves valuable for monitoring wastewater treatment systems in achieving effluent permits while controlling treatment costs. 

At Aster Bio we have been using metagenomic testing for several years and building a database on environmental cultures found in wastewater and soil remediation sites. We are now ready to work with our customers to implement metagenomics testing as a routine monitoring technology. For more information on Environmental Genomics, contact Aster Bio by email (info@asterbio.com) or phone 1 (713) 724-0082
<<Previous

    Author

    Erik Rumbaugh has been involved in biological waste treatment for over 20 years. He has worked with industrial and municipal wastewater  facilities to ensure optimal performance of their treatment systems. He is a founder of Aster Bio (www.asterbio.com) specializing in biological waste treatment.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

    Click to set custom HTML

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos used under Creative Commons from Picturepest, marcoverch, perzonseowebbyra, Picturepest, Picturepest, dsearls, dungodung, Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism, aqua.mech, vastateparksstaff, hile, Aaron Volkening, amishsteve, Neil DeMaster, mklwong88, KOMUnews, Picturepest, kaibara87