For years, studies have been done to show the negative impacts of aquaculture on receiving streams. Environmental damages include destruction of wetlands, increased nutrients (nitrogen & phosphorous) in the effluent, and organic pollution from animal wastes.
A recent study of the Potamac River by researchers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) used modeling and scientific evaluations to estimate that virtually all nitrogen pollution (leading cause of algae blooms in brackish water such as the Chesapeake Bay) can be eliminated if 40% of the river bed were used for shellfish cultivation. Even using just 15- 25% of the river bed can remove up to 50% of the nutrients.
The nutrients are removed by the filter feeding process of the oysters. The removal of organic particles and nutrients will result in lower nutrient loadings entering the imperiled areas of the Chesapeake Bay. This filtering would also increase dissolved oxygen residuals, reducing the dead zones often seen in polluted waters.
Erik Rumbaugh has been involved in biological waste treatment for over 20 years. He has worked with industrial and municipal wastewater facilities to ensure optimal performance of their treatment systems. He is a founder of Aster Bio (www.asterbio.com) specializing in biological waste treatment.
Click to set custom HTML