• Blog
  • Wastewater Testing
  • Bioaugmentation Applications
  • Useful Information
  • About Us
BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT EXPERT
Contact Us

If 2.0 mg/L D.O. is enough for nitrification, why do I need to maintain 3.0+ D.O. to keep my system removing ammonia?

9/17/2019

 
Picture
As you go deeper into a sludge granule or floc, you have decreasing oxygen residuals with even true anaerobic conditions deep in the biofilm.
All the literature says that you get over 90% efficiency from AOB/NOB when you run a D.O. residual of 2.0 mg/L. Yet I often encounter systems that have to keep D.O. above 3+ mg/L to maintain stable AOB/NOB populations. The utility costs associated with the extra D.O. are reason enough to investigate why running high D.O. is needed. To fully understand what is going on, we have used Microbial Community Analysis (MCA) which is the total microbial census inside the aeration tank using 16s sequencing. 

Here is what we found:
  • D.O. readings come from meters mounted to tank walls or dropped in by an operator. This is the D.O. in the water phase - remember the bacteria in activated sludge other systems are designed to be in the floc or biofilm.
  • Oxygen transfer across the biofilm results in zones that move from oxygen rich to even anaerobic at the center of floc. This is how we find Clostridia  and other anaerobic bacteria in highly aerobic systems.
  • While AOB/NOB tend to grow on the outside layer of the biofilm where oxygen is most abundant, the cells are still subject to biofilm oxygen transfer across extracellular polymer (EPS) materials that bind the floc.
  • There is a relationship between D.O. required and the amount of biological solids maintained in the system. Higher MLSS/MLVSS needs more oxygen to keep a greater percentage of the floc oxygen rich.
  • Ability of oxygen to penetrate into floc is specific to system. Variation in aeration type, EPS makeup, sludge age, inorganics, temperature, and other factors impact oxygen transfer into the floc.
So, the real reason for needing a higher than textbook D.O. residual in the aeration tank has to do with how we measure D.O. in the water phase. We cannot really measure D.O. inside the floc or biofilm. We can learn about D.O. and biochemical processes in the biofilm/floc by using MCA and qPCR testing which shows the actual % of obligate aerobes vs anaerobic cultures inside the MLSS. 
Kevin Green link
9/21/2019 06:37:37 am

I’m interested is process utilizing nano-bubble as a source of o2. I’m sure the energy requirements would be significantly reduced. What are the restriction of using such technology? Biomass mixing? Would it be weight/buoyancy issue? The reason I’m asking is that I make a non-mechanical mixer that releases a bust of 20’ per second with a rate depending on direct airflow to the accumulator. At 20’ per second there is little to no OTE, but if I include it with a fine bubble diffuser, I can improve the OTE by three fold. I’m interested in trying the nano-bubble process to determine complete mix and OTE with maximum energy efficiency. What are you thoughts.

Erik Rumbaugh
9/21/2019 07:16:30 am

Nanobubbles have excellent OTE but I have found that mixing is required to keep solids suspended. The second part of the cost equation is the need for pure or at least concentrated oxygen for true nanobubble formation. If you use 20% O2 air, the bubbles don't have the same repulsion and will rise just at a slower rate. I have woked on several different nanobubble systems with varying technologies - it all depends on your application as to which one is best.

Mike Dunigan at Infusion Tech has been working with the systems over the years. His wesite is https://www.infusiontechinc.com/


Comments are closed.

    Author

    Erik Rumbaugh has been involved in biological waste treatment for over 20 years. He has worked with industrial and municipal wastewater  facilities to ensure optimal performance of their treatment systems. He is a founder of Aster Bio (www.asterbio.com) specializing in biological waste treatment.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

    Click to set custom HTML

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos used under Creative Commons from Picturepest, marcoverch, perzonseowebbyra, Picturepest, Picturepest, dsearls, dungodung, Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism, aqua.mech, vastateparksstaff, hile, Aaron Volkening, amishsteve, Neil DeMaster, mklwong88, KOMUnews, Picturepest, kaibara87