• Blog
  • Wastewater Testing
  • Bioaugmentation Applications
  • Useful Information
  • About Us
BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT EXPERT
Contact Us

qPCR offers a faster more acurate way to enumerate specific microbes. Faster and more accurate than plate counts, qPCR can also save on testing cost.

5/23/2019

 
Picture
qPCR is an analytical test that can be used to estimate the amount of specific bacteria in a sample such as a wastewater MLSS sample. 

Different strains of bacteria each have unique genetic fingerprints encoded in DNA. qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) tests count these DNA fingerprints. Depending on how the test is run, a qPCR test can count all the bacteria, or just a specific subset, like the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, present in a sample.
While qPCR can give absolute values (for example, 1.3 × 10^9 bacteria per milliliter of MLSS), the accuracy of the measurement depends on a lot of factors that are difficult to control. For this reason, we usually report relative numbers, which requires that we always run at least two tests on each sample.

The “Denominator” Test is for Total BacteriaFor every sample, we measure all the bacteria present in a sample using a standardized, reproducible protocol. This test measures a key gene, the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, that is found in all bacteria (and humans, too!). This number ends up being the denominator in all future calculations. Typical measurements of MLSS samples range from 1 × 10^6 to 5 × 10^7 copies per reaction.

The “Numerator” Test Varies
qPCR tests can be incredibly specific, able to detect and measure quantities of bacteria at the subspecies level! The test is also very sensitive: a properly designed test can measure 1 to 10 copies of the DNA fingerprint in a single reaction! And, samples can always be diluted to keep them within the upper limits of detection We routinely test for ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOBs), filaments, and zoogloeal bulking.
​
The Results
​qPCR results are often reported as a fraction or percentage. For example, in a wastewater system with nitrification, the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria usually range from 0.1% to 1.0% of the total count. Lower numbers may indicate loss of nitrification, while higher numbers may indicate unusually heavy loadings of ammonia. Type 1701 filaments range from 0.002% to as high as 20%! 
While the relative numbers are useful, we find the trend in the numbers to be the real value. Each wastewater treatment plant is a little different, so the acceptable range for a particular microorganism differs from plant to plant. But, the trends within a single plant can reveal a slow increase in problematic filaments or foaming microorganisms to allow operators to take action before there is a crisis. Likewise, slow drops in nitrifiers can signal chronic toxicity before the entire population is lost.

Comments are closed.

    Author

    Erik Rumbaugh has been involved in biological waste treatment for over 20 years. He has worked with industrial and municipal wastewater  facilities to ensure optimal performance of their treatment systems. He is a founder of Aster Bio (www.asterbio.com) specializing in biological waste treatment.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

    Click to set custom HTML

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos used under Creative Commons from Picturepest, marcoverch, perzonseowebbyra, Picturepest, Picturepest, dsearls, dungodung, Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism, aqua.mech, vastateparksstaff, hile, Aaron Volkening, amishsteve, Neil DeMaster, mklwong88, KOMUnews, Picturepest, kaibara87